RSS 
Email 
Twitter
FacebookThe Curse of Knowledge — The More You Know, the Worse You Become At Communicating That Knowledge
January 24th, 2007 | Posted in Technical Writing 11 Comments »
The Curse of Knowledge is a concept is a book called Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die. The curse of knowledge concept has generated quite a bit of buzz. Here’s an excerpt, which I got from 37 Signals:
People tend to think that having a great idea is enough, and they think the communication part will come naturally. We are in deep denial about the difficulty of getting a thought out of our own heads and into the heads of others. It’s just not true that, “If you think it, it will stick.”
And that brings us to the villain of our book: The Curse of Knowledge. Lots of research in economics and psychology shows that when we know something, it becomes hard for us to imagine not knowing it. As a result, we become lousy communicators. Think of a lawyer who can’t give you a straight, comprehensible answer to a legal question. His vast knowledge and experience renders him unable to fathom how little you know. So when he talks to you, he talks in abstractions that you can’t follow. And we’re all like the lawyer in our own domain of expertise.
Here’s the great cruelty of the Curse of Knowledge: The better we get at generating great ideas—new insights and novel solutions—in our field of expertise, the more unnatural it becomes for us to communicate those ideas clearly. That’s why knowledge is a curse. But notice we said “unnatural,” not “impossible.” Experts just need to devote a little time to applying the basic principles of stickiness.
JFK dodged the Curse [with “put a man on the moon in a decade”]. If he’d been a modern-day politician or CEO, he’d probably have said, “Our mission is to become the international leader in the space industry, using our capacity for technological innovation to build a bridge towards humanity’s future.” That might have set a moon walk back fifteen years.
This book is so relevant to technical writers. In my recent interview with Thom Haller, he mentioned how familiarity is one of the main things that gets in the way of clarity. This is a total paradox, though. The more you know an application, the better poised you are to write a good help file. But the more you know an application, the more familiar you are with it, and so you are less likely to write a good help file.
The trick is, how do you know what you do not know? How do you maintain the fresh perspective of one who is seeing for the first time?
[...] Curse of Knowledge [...]
[...] (2007.04.04) This is just sad.And this, well, I don’t think so. # posted by Milan Davidovic @ 9:19 PM 2 comments links to this post [...]
[...] de I’d rather be writing blog kwam ik een heel mooi voorbeeld tegen, wat gelijk een paradox is. Op het moment dat je een [...]
[...] http://www.dukece.com/spotlight/MadetoStick.htm [Found on Google, Windows Live, Yahoo! Search] 9. The Curse of Knowledge The More You Know, the Worse You Become At Communicating … JFK dodged the Curse [with "put a man on the moon in a decade" ... mission is to become [...]
[...] Why doctors are so poor at communicating with patients – The Curse of Knowledge [...]
[...] Actually, when you become so tech savvy that you can’t imagine users not understanding how to disable a popup blocker or not knowing how to do a simple task, when you are stunned at users who double-click when they should single-click, or who single-click when they should double-click, at this point, you lose some ability to write for the lowest common denominator. It’s not such a bad thing if you’re technically challenged. So are most of your users! You’ll be on a level playing field and will probably write a help manual that actually speaks their language. (See this related post, “The Curse of Knowledge — The More You Know, the Worse You Become at Communicating that Knowled….”) [...]
The curse of knowledge can be overcome by simple examples. I have seen many presentations about the most abstract subject on Earth, simplified by very descriptive examples.
In my opinion prejudice is a curse, not the knowledge itself.
is there a way to become a content writer for the site?
[...] “The curse of knowledge. When you know the idea you’re talking about, but the audience doesn’t, and you can’t share their perspective, because you know it already, and you can’t put yourself in the position of un-knowing it, so it biases how you communicate. You knew where you were headed in that sentence, but I didn’t have a clue. I couldn’t activate a schema until I knew what it was about, so I was overwhelmed by the intrinsic cognitive load of what you were saying.” [...]
[...] – whatever that means. The danger, of course, is to fall into the trap of the Curse of Knowledge – that insidious place we find ourselves when we’re competent at something and are needing to [...]
Thank you for this explanation of ‘the curse of knowledge.’ I haven’t read the book Made to Stick. When I came across the phrase yesterday I was confused. Did it refer to the distain the uneducated have for the educated? The distrust of science? Let’s burn them at the stake for saying the world isn’t flat or that the earth goes around the sun. Or maybe having or using ‘forbidden knowledge’ could get you burned at the stake. Or perhaps this describes they way the folks that saw the economic downturn coming felt when they tried to warn us. All of those sound more like a curse that simply that experts appear to have poor communication skills. Many experts forget to consider the audience they write for or present to. Not nearly as catchy as ‘the curse of knowledge’.