Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • My Calendar
  • Presentations
  • WordPress Consulting
  • Advertising
  • Podcasts
  • Jobs

  • Collaborative Authoring Trends and Costs

    December 11th, 2009 | Posted in Technical Writing, Web 2.0 2 Comments »

    How do you go from 5 authors to 47, all collaborating on the same documentation? This is the issue Anne Gentle wrestles with in her post Collaborative Authoring — Tools and Costs. She explores everything from Author-it Live to Drupal, Mediawiki, Alfresco, and SharePoint, including cost breakdowns for each tool.

    Anne also cites research from Forrester about the rising trend of collaborative authoring:

    37% of organizations surveyed in Forrester’s Q4 2008 enterprise and SMB software survey consider implementing a collaboration strategy important in 2009

    My Thoughts:

    I think collaborative authoring will continue to grow in the future. Large, expensive solutions may give way to more popular, open-source options. As more groups adopt open-source solutions, the open-source solutions will become stronger. Any time you have thousands of developers and users behind a platform, they create a surge of extensions and themes, hacks and tutorials, enhancements and workarounds.

    No single project team can compete with the collective contributions of thousands of developers on a global scale. And just maybe — here’s a thought — the best platforms for collaborative authoring are those platforms that are collaboratively constructed themselves.

    These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
    • del.icio.us
    • StumbleUpon
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • TwitThis

    Tags: ,

    2 Responses to “Collaborative Authoring Trends and Costs”

    1. Larry Kunz says:

      All of the trends are pointing this way. In fact, collaborative authoring is fast becoming the norm — if it isn’t the norm already.

      I’m afraid we might be in for a few years of “wild, wild west” as the various formats and solutions vie for supremacy. Eventually we’ll reach consensus on a small set, driven (as you say) by open-source standards. DITA has emerged as a standard for topic creation and reuse; now we’re starting to see viable open-source content management systems. Maybe the next big thing will be aligning the various community-based authoring tools with these standards.

    Leave a Reply

    « »