<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reading Blogs versus Reading Traditional Print Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/</link>
	<description>Technical Communication Blog / Technical Writing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trade Show Ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/comment-page-1/#comment-147542</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Show Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 04:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/#comment-147542</guid>
		<description>Blogs mainly help in discovering new ideas and lot of business can be done with the help of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogs mainly help in discovering new ideas and lot of business can be done with the help of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Optimiza el feedback de tu blog</title>
		<link>http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/comment-page-1/#comment-145139</link>
		<dc:creator>Optimiza el feedback de tu blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/#comment-145139</guid>
		<description>[...] Podemos viajar por el tiempo en un simple clic. Este es un motivo más para aprovechar y alimentar el espíritu investigativo. No hay que tragar entero, tampoco esperar a recibir el número nuevo de la revista para aclarar una duda. ¿Por qué pensar que toda la información sobre un tema debe estar condensada en un sólo Post? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Podemos viajar por el tiempo en un simple clic. Este es un motivo más para aprovechar y alimentar el espíritu investigativo. No hay que tragar entero, tampoco esperar a recibir el número nuevo de la revista para aclarar una duda. ¿Por qué pensar que toda la información sobre un tema debe estar condensada en un sólo Post? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: document imaging JIm</title>
		<link>http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/comment-page-1/#comment-137356</link>
		<dc:creator>document imaging JIm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/#comment-137356</guid>
		<description>Blogs are a great instant form of publishing, but I don&#039;t think they will ever replace traditional print media. Also the amount of dead stagnant blogs out there means that very few are actually looked at regularly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogs are a great instant form of publishing, but I don&#8217;t think they will ever replace traditional print media. Also the amount of dead stagnant blogs out there means that very few are actually looked at regularly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Those pages feel so good &#171; Jhersch&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/comment-page-1/#comment-134699</link>
		<dc:creator>Those pages feel so good &#171; Jhersch&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/#comment-134699</guid>
		<description>[...] with the author, click on links and learn more or get other perspectives, and being able to trade ideas with others makes but people don’t spend long hours reading their favorite book on the computer. People want [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with the author, click on links and learn more or get other perspectives, and being able to trade ideas with others makes but people don’t spend long hours reading their favorite book on the computer. People want [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2079</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/#comment-2079</guid>
		<description>Clyde,

How cool that you&#039;re quoting from the Journal of the American Medical Association. I might just read the whole article.

Re having information from people who aren&#039;t experts, I think people are trending towards the amateur opinion, at least in some instances. For example, if I buy a book on Amazon and read the customer reviews, I don&#039;t mind if all the reviewers are off the street, rather than NY Times Book Review critics. 

I have the same thoughts toward the tech writer voices podcast. I would like to interview more people who are simply unknowns -- just regular tech writers, but perhaps with interesting ideas.

I hadn&#039;t considered how electronic media had influenced print media, by making it shorter. 

It&#039;s cool that you&#039;ve joined the world of blogging. Thanks for all your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clyde,</p>
<p>How cool that you&#8217;re quoting from the Journal of the American Medical Association. I might just read the whole article.</p>
<p>Re having information from people who aren&#8217;t experts, I think people are trending towards the amateur opinion, at least in some instances. For example, if I buy a book on Amazon and read the customer reviews, I don&#8217;t mind if all the reviewers are off the street, rather than NY Times Book Review critics. </p>
<p>I have the same thoughts toward the tech writer voices podcast. I would like to interview more people who are simply unknowns &#8212; just regular tech writers, but perhaps with interesting ideas.</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t considered how electronic media had influenced print media, by making it shorter. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s cool that you&#8217;ve joined the world of blogging. Thanks for all your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2078</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/#comment-2078</guid>
		<description>Brian,

Your comment about casting real-time votes via cell phone to influence a TV show sounds interesting. I want to try to make my podcasts more interactive, so I&#039;m thinking of somehow soliciting questions from people ahead of time that I then put to the interviewee. 

Re the mobility of print, yes, I agree, this is what makes print attractive (although about being able to take it to the john, someone told me that this was why he bought a PDA device and used Tiddlywiki).

I always hear about electronic paper and so forth, but that never seems to materialize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>Your comment about casting real-time votes via cell phone to influence a TV show sounds interesting. I want to try to make my podcasts more interactive, so I&#8217;m thinking of somehow soliciting questions from people ahead of time that I then put to the interviewee. </p>
<p>Re the mobility of print, yes, I agree, this is what makes print attractive (although about being able to take it to the john, someone told me that this was why he bought a PDA device and used Tiddlywiki).</p>
<p>I always hear about electronic paper and so forth, but that never seems to materialize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2077</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/#comment-2077</guid>
		<description>Sarah,

Thanks for the tip about http://www.commentful.com. I was perusing that site and it looks really interesting. I assume you use it to keep on top of all the conversations you have going on in different spaces? 

I agree that for longer, more authoritative discussion, print is preferred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah,</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip about <a href="http://www.commentful.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.commentful.com</a>. I was perusing that site and it looks really interesting. I assume you use it to keep on top of all the conversations you have going on in different spaces? </p>
<p>I agree that for longer, more authoritative discussion, print is preferred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde Parson</title>
		<link>http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2071</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde Parson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/#comment-2071</guid>
		<description>Tom, 

It seems like only yesterday we were told that our collective offices would be &quot;paperless&quot; and today the prediction is for a world without print media. 

While I wholeheartedly agree with the fact that the blog encourages interaction and is therefore more engaging,  I still see a couple of issues that will prevent it from ultimately replacing print media entirely.  

1. The ensuing discussion generated by a blog entry almost exclusively consists of the opinions of individuals who may not be experts in the topic being discussed.

The argument can be made that open discussion results in a more robust understanding of a given topic, however, it can also be shown that a group consensus isn&#039;t always correct.

2. Printed media generally consists of higher quality printing which makes it much easier to read.

The research behind this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&amp;pubmedid=11999183&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;JMLA article&lt;/a&gt; shows that &quot;the most-cited reasons for preferring print included that the format was easier to read with better graphic quality, easier to browse, and easier to access.  One user stated that with print, one was &#039;not distracted by the process; with electronic [there are] too many loose ends, false trails, lack of ability to focus,&#039;...&quot;

It is highly likely that blogs and other electronic media will continue to create change in the world of print.  Printed material has already changed. Just compare a recent printed copy of PC Magazine to one from 10 years ago and you will easily see the impact electronic media has had when you see the recent copy is only about one-fourth the size.  But, even with a high tech audience, a print version still exists.

But, to illustrate an earlier point, this too is just an opinion by someone who&#039;s work experience with printed media is somewhat limited.  

Now, if you&#039;ll excuse me, I have to clean that stack of papers off my desk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, </p>
<p>It seems like only yesterday we were told that our collective offices would be &#8220;paperless&#8221; and today the prediction is for a world without print media. </p>
<p>While I wholeheartedly agree with the fact that the blog encourages interaction and is therefore more engaging,  I still see a couple of issues that will prevent it from ultimately replacing print media entirely.  </p>
<p>1. The ensuing discussion generated by a blog entry almost exclusively consists of the opinions of individuals who may not be experts in the topic being discussed.</p>
<p>The argument can be made that open discussion results in a more robust understanding of a given topic, however, it can also be shown that a group consensus isn&#8217;t always correct.</p>
<p>2. Printed media generally consists of higher quality printing which makes it much easier to read.</p>
<p>The research behind this <a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&amp;pubmedid=11999183" rel="nofollow">JMLA article</a> shows that &#8220;the most-cited reasons for preferring print included that the format was easier to read with better graphic quality, easier to browse, and easier to access.  One user stated that with print, one was &#8216;not distracted by the process; with electronic [there are] too many loose ends, false trails, lack of ability to focus,&#8217;&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>It is highly likely that blogs and other electronic media will continue to create change in the world of print.  Printed material has already changed. Just compare a recent printed copy of PC Magazine to one from 10 years ago and you will easily see the impact electronic media has had when you see the recent copy is only about one-fourth the size.  But, even with a high tech audience, a print version still exists.</p>
<p>But, to illustrate an earlier point, this too is just an opinion by someone who&#8217;s work experience with printed media is somewhat limited.  </p>
<p>Now, if you&#8217;ll excuse me, I have to clean that stack of papers off my desk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2067</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/#comment-2067</guid>
		<description>I think this is another symptom of the evolution of the sharing of information.  I too am often frustrated by non-interactive media.  The printed word is a dinosaur that will be extinct before long.

Technical documentation is shifting from monolithic texts to context-sensitive snippets.  Who&#039;d have guessed Clippy the MS Office paperclip would be a prophetic avatar of technical communication?

This concept goes beyond print, of course.  Taking a cue from Canada&#039;s MuchMusic television station, several upcoming American game and reality shows will allow home audiences to cast realtime votes via cellular phones and the Internet to determine winners and losers.

I participated in an online debate on the topic of the longevity of the magazine industry a while back.  The winning argument in favour of magazines?  You can take them into the john.  Paper can often go where computers can&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is another symptom of the evolution of the sharing of information.  I too am often frustrated by non-interactive media.  The printed word is a dinosaur that will be extinct before long.</p>
<p>Technical documentation is shifting from monolithic texts to context-sensitive snippets.  Who&#8217;d have guessed Clippy the MS Office paperclip would be a prophetic avatar of technical communication?</p>
<p>This concept goes beyond print, of course.  Taking a cue from Canada&#8217;s MuchMusic television station, several upcoming American game and reality shows will allow home audiences to cast realtime votes via cellular phones and the Internet to determine winners and losers.</p>
<p>I participated in an online debate on the topic of the longevity of the magazine industry a while back.  The winning argument in favour of magazines?  You can take them into the john.  Paper can often go where computers can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah O'Keefe</title>
		<link>http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2066</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah O'Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idratherbewriting.com/2007/01/19/reading-blogs-versus-reading-traditional-print-media/#comment-2066</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,

Blogs are great for conversation. Magazine articles are perhaps better for longer, more authoritative discussion.

In addition to using RSS/Bloglines to track blog updates, I&#039;ve just found blog comment tracking software (http://www.commentful.com). If I comment on a blog, I can track  the comment trail so that I&#039;m notified when there are updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>Blogs are great for conversation. Magazine articles are perhaps better for longer, more authoritative discussion.</p>
<p>In addition to using RSS/Bloglines to track blog updates, I&#8217;ve just found blog comment tracking software (<a href="http://www.commentful.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.commentful.com</a>). If I comment on a blog, I can track  the comment trail so that I&#8217;m notified when there are updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
